View Full Version : RPM -problem in the latest RJGC build 72
Christian Jungbluth
01-25-2006, 12:13 PM
Hi there,
since the latest build 72 for the PM RJCG the ITT in the turboprops displays
correct now :-)
But for this, the RPM Display is wrong now (well working til the build 70!).
See picture, it shows only 1.0 (instead of 100%)and isn,t adjustable by the
RPM-factor anymore, wathever I type in?
At the low position of the prop lever it shows 0.8 (instead of 90%). What
happened?
The aircraft is the PMDG B1900D, I didnīt try another yet.
Regards
Chris
Enrico Schiratti
01-25-2006, 01:52 PM
> since the latest build 72 for the PM RJCG the ITT in the
> turboprops displays
> correct now :-)
>
> But for this, the RPM Display is wrong now (well working
> til the build 70!).
> See picture, it shows only 1.0 (instead of 100%)and isn,t
> adjustable by the
> RPM-factor anymore, wathever I type in?
>
> At the low position of the prop lever it shows 0.8
> (instead of 90%). What
> happened?
I will check this... the RPM value is correct though, the %
is wrong then?
Enrico Schiratti
01-25-2006, 01:56 PM
Ok, I forgot to multiply the value by 100 in the 2 and 4
engine setting... uploaded as 73b... thanks.
Ciao
Enrico
"Christian Jungbluth" wrote in
message news:386121.77412@wb.onvix.com...
> Hi there,
>
> since the latest build 72 for the PM RJCG the ITT in the
> turboprops displays
> correct now :-)
>
> But for this, the RPM Display is wrong now (well working
> til the build 70!).
> See picture, it shows only 1.0 (instead of 100%)and isn,t
> adjustable by the
> RPM-factor anymore, wathever I type in?
>
> At the low position of the prop lever it shows 0.8
> (instead of 90%). What
> happened?
>
> The aircraft is the PMDG B1900D, I didnīt try another yet.
>
>
> Regards
>
> Chris
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
Christian Jungbluth
01-26-2006, 09:40 AM
On 1/25/2006 12:56:24 PM, Enrico Schiratti wrote:
>Ok, I forgot to multiply the
>value by 100 in the 2 and 4
>engine setting... uploaded as
>73b... thanks.
Thanks, too!
Chris