SA_WXR Version 1.6

[eudoniga]

Nice catch !

Let's see if it works, but it almost sounds too easy to be true ...

Thanks again, Tim.

[flightdeck]

News from Florian/Addon Gauges:

I have fixed this tricky bug now, should work now, update to SA_WXR 1.7 and no need for a MAC license.

http://forums.simflight.com/viewtopic.php?f=193&t=64980

I'm going to give it a try this evening!

[Thomas Richter]

News from Florian/Addon Gauges:
http://forums.simflight.com/viewtopic.php?f=193&t=64980

I'm going to give it a try this evening!

Hi

Thanks for the info.

It works now like before !!

[michelmvd]

Netdir should in any case placed on CDU PC, reduces Net-traffic!

Hi Thomas,
Is this also the case when you don't use SA WXR, as I think, default the PM use an auto dir in the default FS9 map.

B. Rgds
Michel

[Thomas Richter]

Hi Thomas,
Is this also the case when you don't use SA WXR, as I think, default the PM use an auto dir in the default FS9 map.

B. Rgds
Michel

Hi Michel

It has nothing to do with SA_WXR.
CDU read/writes from/to NETDIR and the other PM programs read and read/write from/to NETDIR.
To reduce the read/write traffic in the network the easiest way is to place the NETDIR on the CDU's HD.
When you use the CDU setting to let it create the NETDIR folder it is nayway placed beside or in CDU's folder.

E.g. that are ever my settings
-CDU is on C drive
C:\pmCDU

the PC name is AMD-FMC
the NETDIR folder is shared on this PC as NETDIR
in CDU.ini
DisableAutoNetDir=on
NetDir=\\AMD-FMC\netdir\

It looks may be crazy that I use the shared name \\AMD-FMC\netdir\ instead of the real lacation C:\pmCDU\Netdir , but this works best for me.
All installations of CDU/MCDU I do in this way without any problems, like others often have.

[flightdeck]

SA_WXR 1.7 works with PM ND now !!!

[Suggy]

Can anybody tell me what inmprovements have been made since 1.4?

Thanks,

Darren Sugden

[Trevor Hale]

Not requiring an email to get the program to work! Thats the only change, that I am aware of!

[Tim]

So are you saying, going from 1.4 to 1.7 shows no other work to the program? If so, then there are no improvements and probably never will be any!

[Trevor Hale]

I am not sure what the author of the software plans, however I would expect what you say is a correct assumption.