Results 1 to 10 of 15
-
03-29-2014, 12:34 AM #1
Jeehell compared to Project Magenta
Well I have just about everything installed andworking, as far as JL. has programmed .
Have installed the Open Cockpit radios just usingIOCModules at this stage as I will work on getting the communications going with Radar Contact etc. Have the Trim Wheel working ok with IOC Modules as well.
All overhead are now working and lit up correctly.Running all this on just 3 computers. The 3rd one is just for the RMCDU only,but will use Radar Contact on that one as well. I am using FDS InterfaceITcards for most buttons and leds, as well as a couple of Bodnar cards, The FCU is CPFlight, the MCDU's are FDS,the radios are Open Cockpit.The rest is all home made.
What a pleasure to start up Jeehell's software. It all works so simply (except for a couple of dumb mistakes I made !!). A big surprise, for me at least, that even the toe brakes are 10 times better than PM. All the controls are simple to install and work perfectly.
The best thing is that it works reliably everytime, no stoppages, no lock-ups, no spending weeks and months figuring out what has gone wrong and why, and the service when you have a problem is better than any software that I have ever seen, as well as not having the excuse that "there is something wrong with your system" having been thrown at you when you complain to the software provider that something is not working. Well I spent 13 years trying to get Magenta to work, but no more !!
I could go on, but to summarise in comparison toProgram Magenta: The difference is that one should be free and the otherpayware, as I believe some others have already stated.
For those that are using PM, I would not hesitate in recommending a change over to Jeehell's software.
Again many thanks to JL for all the effort and time he has put into this software and I have to say that he has spent a lot of time getting it as real as it can go, considering some of the limitations of FSX. I am looking forward to many enjoyable hours, flying the aeroplane for a change !
Regards…………….Brian WLast edited by brianwilliamson; 03-29-2014 at 03:28 AM. Reason: spelling
-
Post Thanks / Like - 0 Thanks, 1 Likes, 0 Dislikesskino liked this post
-
03-29-2014, 10:30 AM #2
- Join Date
- Mar 2013
- Location
- UK
- Posts
- 114
Re: Jeehel compared to Project Magenta
wow amazing, what hardware and visuals do you use? cockpitsonic or FDS?
-
03-31-2014, 01:58 AM #3
Re: Jeehel compared to Project Magenta
Using FDS InterfaceIT cards and Bodnar cards, the visuals are 3 Benq 811 ST projectors.
Just plugged the clock in on the MIP and works perfectly.
Regards........................Brian W.
-
03-31-2014, 03:13 AM #4
Re: Jeehel compared to Project Magenta
Hi Brian, amazing shots. Again, you don't mind if we use this on the FMGS website?
Cheers!
P.S. wish I had a chance to visit your Sim while I was in Brisbane. Lots of simmers in that region
-
03-31-2014, 06:53 AM #5
- Join Date
- Mar 2013
- Location
- UK
- Posts
- 114
-
04-01-2014, 05:38 AM #6
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Location
- East Yorkshire UK
- Posts
- 267
Re: Jeehel compared to Project Magenta
Brian
Really valuable work and comments from you. As you know I have been trying the software with a lot of success on a laptop. I have problems when it comes to moving onto the cockpit in that I use FDT Simboards for many of the interfaces. I have found that these don't work with Win 7 (I am changing all the PC's over from XP) and they are not in the Jeehell list of supported software. It looks as though I will have to consider changing those interface boards with the resultant expense but also time. Just one point, what interface do you use for encoders as FDS Sys boards don't deal with them? (This was an advantage with Simboards).
Barry
www.a320sim.comLast edited by Barrykensett; 04-01-2014 at 05:40 AM. Reason: Spelling
-
04-01-2014, 07:14 AM #7
Re: Jeehel compared to Project Magenta
Check this website out -- http://b737home.blogspot.com.au/
Not an airbus build, but they managed to fit it in a ~ 320x160 cm size room. They are only using 2 projectors (W1080ST).
-
04-01-2014, 12:39 PM #8
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Location
- East Yorkshire UK
- Posts
- 267
Re: Jeehel compared to Project Magenta
I moved from projectors to large screens. One result is taking up much less space, something to consider. Although I only use two 47" screens so far I have provision for another two at the side to get 180 degrees. Probably next winter's project.
Barry
www.a320sim.comLast edited by Barrykensett; 04-01-2014 at 12:40 PM. Reason: Spelling
-
04-01-2014, 02:07 PM #9
- Join Date
- Mar 2013
- Location
- UK
- Posts
- 114
-
04-01-2014, 04:54 PM #10
Re: Jeehel compared to Project Magenta
Barry, I do not have any encoders except the ones on the FCU and the RMP's which are integrated. I have not tried this, but the Bodnar cards will handle encoders.
I had the whole suite of FDT cards originally, but sent them back. Too many problems. It may pay to stick to XP just for the FDT boards on one computer. Just a thought.
The change to JL's software is nothing short of brilliant ! It has so much more than Magenta that I will now need to do some more wiring.
Hope you can change over, as I am sure you will enjoy the results.
Regards.......................Brian W.
Search Womans from your town for night
HDG preselect function